Peter Moyo
BULAWAYO – In a sweeping policy change that took effect on 1 January 2025, the Zimbabwean government has decided to extend the retirement age for civil servants and military personnel, sparking a mix of public reactions.
Civil servants can now work until they are 70, up from the previous limit of 65, while military adjustments include a new retirement age of 55 for regular soldiers, extendable to 60, or 65 for war veterans. Commissioned officers in the Zimbabwe Defence Forces will retire at 65, with the option to continue until 70.
The Amalgamated Rural Teachers Union of Zimbabwe (ARTUZ) has publicly opposed the move, launching a petition on X with the message, “Sign our petition demanding the reversal of elevation of retirement age,” highlighting the lack of consultation with workers on this significant change.
In Bulawayo, opinions are divided. Luyanda Ncube, a seasoned civil servant, sees the policy as an opportunity to leverage his extensive experience. “I feel I still have much to offer, and this policy allows me to keep contributing,” he noted.
However, concerns abound, particularly from those like a retired police officer who spoke on condition of anonymity, who questions the policy’s alignment with Zimbabwe’s life expectancy and economic realities. “This isn’t France,” he remarked, “we need dignity in retirement, not just prolonged work.”
The policy has also ignited discussions on youth unemployment. Economist Thabo Sibanda criticized the move stating, “This reckless policy squeezes the job market for youths, already graduating in droves from our universities.” The fear is that with fewer retirements, fewer opportunities will open up for the younger generation.
Moreover, the implications for the already strained pension system loom large. With inflation and currency instability, the prospect of working longer does not necessarily equate to a secure retirement for all.
Social media platforms like X have become battlegrounds for this debate. While some argue that the provision offers some flexibility, some see this as a government out of sync with both its aging workforce and the job-hungry youth.
As this policy unfolds, the coming months will reveal whether the government’s approach will adapt to public sentiment or if the push for experience will overshadow the need for fresh talent in Zimbabwe’s public sector. The balance between respecting seasoned workers and creating pathways for new entrants remains a pivotal conversation.
